Gurumurthy Kalyanaram, Dean, Expert Witness and Former Professor NYIT and UT Dallas

Reports on the Question Is Harsh Criticism of a Commission Headed by an Indian Supreme Court Justice a Reasonable Basis for Contempt Lawsuit against the Critic?

Dr Gurumurthy Kalyanaram - Former Dean and former NYIT and UT Dallas professor and expert witness and Gurumurthy Kalyanaram reports on the Indian Supreme Court Holding on Contempt Lawsuit.

Dr Gurumurthy Kalyanaram, Dean, Expert Witness and Former Professor NYIT and UT Dallas

Reports on the Accomplishments, Outcomes and Posture of the US Supreme Court in 2013-2014 Term

Dr Gurumurthy Kalyanaram - Former Dean and former NYIT and UT Dallas professor Gurumurthy Kalyanaram reports on the accomplishments, outcomes and posture of the US Supreme Court in 2013-2014 Term.

The U.S. Supreme Court granted cert to many important issues, and adjudicated many related lawsuits in the concluded 2013-2014 Term. In resolving these important lawsuits, the U.S. Supreme Court tilted to more conservative posture without completely overturning any of the major landmark holdings but nevertheless denting many of them in a nuanced manner.

Gurumurthy Kalyanaram – Reports on Expert Witness Testimony in a False Claims Act/ qui tam Lawsuit

Gurumurthy Kalyanaram - Former Dean and former NYIT and UT Dallas professor Gurumurthy Kalyanaram reports on his expert witness testimony in a False Claims Act/qui tam lawsuit based upon my expert witness testimony, the US government decided to intervene in a qui tam lawsuit against two private educational entities.

The background to the lawsuit is as follows. Two educational entities had collaborated and designed an on-line educational program. According to the complaint, the institutes were purportedly offering degrees without completion of the requisite requirements, employing unqualified faculty and using inadequate facilities. The on-line educational program was also purportedly engaged in commissions-based student recruitment process.

Gurumurthy Kalyanaram, Dean, Expert Witness and Former Professor NYIT and UT Dallas

Reports on State of Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Decision on Collective Bargaining Rights of Public Workers

Gurumurthy Kalyanaram - Former Dean and former NYIT and UT Dallas professor Gurumurthy Kalyanaram reports on State of Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Decision on Collective Bargaining Rights of Public Workers.

The Unions filed lawsuits in the State Courts against Act 10 of the State of Wisconsin.  The State of Wisconsin legislature, supported and encouraged by the Governor, passed a legislation that severely curtails the collective bargaining rights of public workers.  The legislation – Act 10 -- was passed in 2011.  Act 10 specifically limited bargaining rights to pay raises within the rate of inflation.

Dr. Gurumurthy Kalyanaram - Dean, Expert Witness and Former Professor NYIT and UT Dallas

Dr Gurumurthy Kalyanaram – Reports on The US Supreme Court Decisions on Affordable Healthcare Act 2010 and Mandatory Labor Union Membership for Government Employees. Gurumurthy Kalyanaram NYIT

Former Dean and former NYIT and UT Dallas professor Gurumurthy Kalyanaram reports on the recent important US Supreme Court decisions on Affordable Healthcare Act and mandatory Labor Union membership for government employees. Gurumurthy Kalyanaram UT Dallas

Lawsuits filed by Hobby Lobby Stores and Conestoga Wood Specialties led to review of certain provision of the Affordable Healthcare Act, 2010 by the US Supreme Court. Gurumurthy Kalyanaram Lawsuit

Gurumurthy Kalyanaram, Dean, Expert Witness and Former Professor NYIT and UT Dallas, Lawsuit on Public Policy

Gurumurthy Kalyanaram - Former Dean and former NYIT and UT Dallas professor Gurumurthy Kalyanaram reports on three important US Supreme Court decisions on law and lawsuit and public policy matters issued in 2014.  Here is an executive summary of these decisions. Gurumurthy Kalyanaram Lawsuit

On Campaign Finance, McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission Gurumurthy Kalyanaram NYIT

A lawsuit filed by McCutcheon against Federal Election Commission, and supported by Republican National Party, found its way to the US Supreme Court.  The Court held that that the overall limits for contributions from individuals to candidates and political parties was against freedom of expression and therefore, unconstitutional.  The Court, however, did not disturb base limits of $2,600 per election.  The Court had never before had struck down a federal contribution limit. Gurumurthy Kalyanaram UT Dallas

Dr Gurumurthy Kalyanaram - NYIT and UT Dallas (Dean and Former) - Freedom of Speech and Political Contribution

Gurumurthy Kalyanaram - Former Dean and former professor NYIT and UT Dallas professor, lawsuit and law reports here on the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, No. 12-536. Gurumurthy Kalyanaram NYIT

Shaun McCutcheon, an Alabama businessman, filed a lawsuit challenging the Federal Elections Commission on the overall limit of $48,600 by individuals every two years for contributions to all federal candidates.  And the Republican National Committee joined him in challenging the limit on contributions to political parties. Gurumurthy Kalyanaram Lawsuit